Good people,
Dancing huko ICC
ochacho............A what maxi.....!!!
Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
Check this
out ---------------Terje Rød-Larsen was
compelled to resign from his ministerial functions in Norway because he
falsified his declarations in such a way that he did not pay taxes for the past
10 years. With his fraudulent qualities, he was nominated to serve at the United
Nations.
President
Uhuru Kenyatta request for exemption from continuous attendance granted with
conditions
Updated Friday, October 18th 2013 at 21:57
GMT +3
By WAHOME THUKU and ALPHONCE SHIUNDU
President Uhuru Kenyatta has
been given some relief over his trial at The Hague after judges directed that he
would attend part of the proceedings at the International Criminal Court ( ICC).
In what could ease pressure on the court and the President over the case,
the Trial Chamber V(b)on Friday conditionally excused Uhuru from continuous
presence at his trial which starts on November 12.
The decision, which was made following request by Uhuru was made by the
majority of the Chamber, with presiding judge Kuniko Ozazi dissenting.
The two judges Robert Fremr and Chile Eboe-Osuji who granted the request,
however, ruled that President Uhuru must be physically present for the entirety
of the opening session, during the making of closing statements of all parties
and participants, hearings when victims present their views and concerns in
person, the delivery of judgement and any other attendance ordered by the
Chamber.
“If applicable, Uhuru is also required to be present during sentencing
hearings, the delivery of sentencing, the entirety of victim impact hearings, as
well as reparation hearings,” the judges decided.
President Uhuru is charged, as an indirect co-perpetrator with five counts
of crimes against humanity consisting of murder, deportation or forcible
transfer, rape, persecution and other inhumane acts allegedly committed during
the post-election violence in Kenya in 2007-2008. Charges were confirmed on
January 23, 2012, and the case was committed to trial before Trial Chamber
V(b).
The decision could influence the debate on whether the case should be
deferred as recommended by the African Union and proposed to the United Nation’s
Security Council, until Uhuru and his deputy William Ruto complete their term in
office.
Closing sessions
The two judge said the
excusal could be revoked if the President violated any of the condition and a
warrant for his arrest could be issued where appropriate.
They said excusal was
strictly granted to accommodate the demanding functions of Uhuru’s office as
President of Kenya, and not merely to gratify the dignity of his own occupation
of that office. A similar excusal had been granted to Ruto by Trial Chamber V(A)
on June 18, but was suspended by the Appeals Chamber following an appeal by the
Prosecution. Judge Osuji is the presiding the case against Ruto and radio
journalist Joshua Sang
The two judges said granting
such an exception was motivated in part by not only the need to ensure the
fairness and expeditiousness of the trial in full respect to the rights of
President Uhuru as an accused, but also, the need for due regard for the
protection of victims and witnesses.
The decision in the Uhuru
case is also likely to be appealed against by the Office of the
Prosecutor.
Earlier, President Kenyatta’s
political advisor Joshua Kutuny had called for his boss to be exempted from
being physical presence at the ICC save for the
opening and closing sessions.
Addressing a news conference
at his office in Nairobi’s Harambee House, Kutuny said the country cannot afford
having the Head of State sitting in court, without giving any input.
“I am not happy. The Deputy
President is in that courtroom at The Hague. He just sits. He never does
anything. Why do you keep him there idle yet he has so much to do back here?
We’re telling the ICC that it doesn’t
add value to make the Deputy President sit idle for up to eight hours; they
should not subject the President to the same treatment,” Kutuny said on
Friday.
------------------------------------------
US prosecutor condemns
Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
From: khaguli maurice
To: "progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com"; "uchunguzionline@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:56 AM
Subject: [PK] KM and OKLI, kama hii beer!
To: "progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:56 AM
Subject: [PK] KM and OKLI, kama hii beer!
Ruto; Uhuru hii maneno ya ICC ni kama hii beer ndani ya maninio yangu.
Uhuru; ai! Ruto, hata hii yangu ni nzito sana sijui kama tutafaulu but wewe uko
na nafasi ya kusetiwa free msee-Mudavadi ndie alilaani sisi-niombee ndugu!
----- Forwarded
Message -----
From: paul nyandoto
To: "wanakenya@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
From: paul nyandoto
To: "wanakenya@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
The man is right (US
prosecutor):
Remember even the ICC, Ocampo; Koffi Anna etc told kenyans to form local
tribunal to try PEV victims at home. But hell no, they wanted Hague and ICC.
Then they used ICC propaganda to climb to presidency & Deputy president.
Whose mistake is it?. It is not ICC `s mistake that Uhuru & Ruto are there.
The mistake is on Kenyans who wanted it. So all these hindsight wisdom springing
while ICC was used as a propaganda to attain power are all rubbish. Let them go
to Hague, that is where their destiny rest. Cheating people all the time will
finally fail and its is failing. I wish they knew.
Paul.
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:16:32
-0400 Subject: US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan
leaders From: kjmwangi@gmail.com To:
progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com CC: Wanakenya@googlegroups.com;
uchunguzionline@yahoogroups.com; africa-oped@yahoogroups.com;
VuguVuguMashinani@yahoogroups.com
Ndugu Khaguli and other loudmouths:
Can you let us know what is
going here? Do you agree with this prosecutor?
----------------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded
Message -----From: Maurice Oduor
To: Progressive Kenyans
Cc: WanaKenya; uchunguzi online
; Africa-Oped
; VVM Vuguvugu Mashinani
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PK] US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
To: Progressive Kenyans
Cc: WanaKenya
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PK] US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
KM,
This David Crane does
not offer any solution. In this article, do you see any solution he has offered?
Just saying that "political realities have to be taken into account" is an empty
statement.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Kuria-Mwangi
<kjmwangi@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ndugu Khaguli and other
loudmouths:
Can you let us know what is
going here? Do you agree with this
prosecutor?
******
US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
Daniel Howden in Nairobi
theguardian.com, Friday 18 October 2013 02.52
EDT
David Crane, the
former chief prosecutor of the special court for Sierra Leone. Photograph: Ben
Curtis/AFP/Getty Images
A former chief prosecutor of the
international criminal court has condemned its cases against
Kenya's president and vice-president, warning that the
indictments could damage the fledgling international justice system.
David Crane, the US lawyer who
built the case against Liberia's former president Charles
Taylor, said his successors at The Hague had ignored political realities in
pursuing the Kenyan prosecution, which he said "could be the beginning of a long
slide into irrelevance for international law".
Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president,
is due to stand trial next month at the ICC, the first time a sitting head of
state will have done so. Along with his deputy, William Ruto, whose separate but
related trial has already begun, Kenyatta is accused of masterminding the
violence that killed at least 1,300 people in the wake of a disputed election at
the turn of 2007-08.
Last week the African Union passed a resolution calling for
immunity for all serving African heads of state.
"I would never have indicted or
gotten involved in justice for the Kenyan tragedy," said Crane, a former chief
prosecutor of the special court for Sierra Leone, a precursor to the ICC. "It's
placed them in a situation where they are damned if they do or damned if they
don't."
The African Union has called on
the Kenyan leaders not to attend hearings at The Hague until the UN security
council, which oversees the ICC, has responded to its recent demands.
France is working on a UN
resolution that would defer the Kenyan cases for 12 months, according to a
senior diplomat in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi.
Human rights groups have said
giving in to AU demands for immunity would set a terrible precedent that would
encourage heads of state to trample constitutional term limits, cling to power
and rig elections. "It's become a lose-lose situation," said Crane.
Crane said the cases he built
during three years of investigations in westAfrica from 2002-05 had taken into account local politics as
well as the law. "Politics is the bright red thread of modern international law,
a successful prosecution must factor in the international stage."
After ad hoc tribunals dealt with
the fallout from civil wars in the Balkans and west Africa, as well as the
genocide in Rwanda, the ICC got a permanent home in the Netherlands and issued
its first arrest warrants in 2005.
Under the Argentinian lawyer Luis
Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor's office pursued high-profile African leaders,
including Sudan's Omar al-Bashir – who has ignored the warrant – and a number of
alleged warlords in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Crane said Moreno-Ocampo had a
"political tin ear" and had been overly ambitious in his indictments.
When Kenya came close to a civil
war and as many as 400,000 people lost their homes after a contested election
result in 2007, mediators brokered a deal under which a national tribunal was
meant to be set up to try the guilty. The ICC stepped in as a court of last
resort when the Kenyan parliament could not agree on a local alternative.
Moreno-Ocampo became a celebrity
in Kenya, with minibus taxis named after him, but his initial popularity waned,
and this was exacerbated by his decision to name Kenyatta and Ruto, political
rivals whose supporters had fought during the violence, among the indictees. The
pair united in a "coalition of the accused" and won elections this year in a
campaign that portrayed the ICC as a colonial throwback.
Moreno-Ocampo was replaced last
year as chief prosecutor by Gambia's Fatou Bensouda.
Crane said the ICC should have
used the threat of its intervention to nudge for reform rather than launching
prosecutions that the Kenyan elite would never support.
"It's a question of some justice
versus no justice," he said. "If it's perceived that Kenyatta and Ruto have won
then we're thrown back to the pre-Taylor era in Africa."
----------------------------------------------------
Top Ban Ki-moon aide fights Sierra Leone corruption claimsBy KEMO CHAM in Freetown | Friday, March 1 2013 at 12:12
UN Secretary General`s Special Representative on
Sexual Violence in Conflict, Zainab Hawa Bangura.
The UN Secretary General`s
Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Ms Zainab Hawa Bangura,
is fighting to clear her name in an embarrassing graft scandal at
home.
The former Sierra Leonean
health minister has been linked to a corruption scandal involving a Bill and
Belinda Gates Foundation-funded immunisation project run by the Geneva-based
Global Alliance for Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI).
In December, GAVI announced
it had uncovered the misuse of funds allocated to the Health and Sanitation
ministry of about $1.1 million.
As a result, an existing
grant worth over $500,000 was frozen and a pending two year grant of $5. 4
million suspended.
President Ernest Bai Koroma in January suspended 10 senior health ministry
officials as the Anti Corruption Commission (ACC) started a probe.
But government critics have
alleged Ms Bangura was an accomplice as some of the loss happened when she was
health minister, and want her investigated.
Ms Bangura has denied any involvement.
A close ally of the
president, she served as foreign affairs minister between 2007 and
2010.
She was moved to the health ministry in January 2011 ahead of her current
appointment in August the following year.
The alleged misuse of donor
funds, according to the GAVI Alliance, occurred between 2008 and 2010, with one
part in 2011.
Ms Bangura is believed to be
nursing ambitions of a more advanced political career, with a possible eye on
the presidency, a position she first contested for in 2002.
Seen as a defence
But in what is seen as a defence for the embattled former minister, GAVI said the purchase of materials
related to the embezzlement was done by a constituted committee, in line
with the National Public Procurement Act.
It added: “As a Minister, Ms Bangura did not participate in that
Procurement Committee.”
All of the suspended
officials were said to be part of that committee, but the critics say they are
only scapegoats.
A group calling itself Concerned Sierra Leoneans has been extremely vocal
on the issue.
It has alleged that Mrs
Bangura took time off from her UN job to come home and destroy evidence prior to
the institution of investigation.
This issue has affected her
image, hence, according to the GAVI Alliance, she had requested them to clarify
her role on the matter.
Concerned Sierra Leoneans however, is pressurising GAVI to act and has even
accused the Alliance itself of “gross negligence” and possible complicity in the
theft.
"We intend to hold GAVI
responsible for the theft because of their sloppy oversight and will not
hesitate to sue them…,” the group said in a statement, claiming to be speaking
on behalf of defenceless Sierra Leonean children.
According to reports,
officials from the GAVI Alliance were scheduled to be in Freetown this week
seeking an explanation from the government about the missing
funds.
AU: A union for African
people or presidents?
speak outRead Story: AU: A union for African people or
presidents?
speaker’s corner
Most Popular
- Kenyan farmer reaps from quail eggs venture
- Tanzania on EAC: You won't get rid of us easily
- Tanzania ‘formally’ isolated from EAC
- The girl who met Gaddafi 'in hell'
- 'My daughter was a virgin', says Mugabe's wife
- Wanted Ugandan socialite seized in Rwanda
- Madagascar's new sex tourism
- Westgate strike 'proof of Al-Shabaab might'
- Botswana now backs President Kenyatta on ICC
- Pay scandal rocks Sierra Leone`s troops in Somalia
*******************************************
ACCORDING to the Kenyan DAILY
NATION today, the UN SG Ban Ki-Moon has asked African leaders to adhere to their
commitments to the ICC. Meanwhile South Korean ICC JudgeSang-Hyun Song said the
Kenyan Parliament twice refused to enact a local tribunal.
Let Ban Ki-Moon adhere to his
commitment to transparency and integrity by stepping down for a probe into the
allegations against him.
Mohamed Warsama
On Friday, October 18, 2013 4:09 PM, mohamed warsama
wrote:
Corruption
at the Top
An Open Letter to the dishonorable Ban Ki-moon
United Nations
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon visited Lebanon to prepare for a possible NATO
action against Syria. Too busy conspiring against the peace he should be
defending, he forgot to inquire about Israel’s daily violations of Lebanese
sovereignty. In an open letter published by the Lebanese press, Arab thinker
Hassan Hamade lambastes Mr. Ban and his representative Mr. Rød-Larsen, recalling
that far from standing up for principles, both are thugs wallowing in
corruption.
Mr. Secretary General,
While listening to
your speech in Beirut, in which you proclaimed the absolute necessity to proceed
with the reforms, “because the
flame of freedom ignited in Tunisia shall never be extinguished”, I
immediately thought of a Swedish person, famous for her integrity, transparency
and credibility in terms of reforms. I meant Mrs. Inga-Britt Ahlenius, who was
once the UN Under Secretary General, in charge of the United Nations Office of
Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), which main mission was to ensure the good
services providing of this “big machine”, namely in the finance field and
who served under your supervision.
You certainly know,
Mr. Secretary General, that Mrs. Ahlenius, whose professional career has always
been flawless, be it in Sweden or during her office at the administration of the
UNO, has drafted a 50-page report related to the status of the Organization in
terms of finance and utilization of public funds in budgets of various
services.
Said report clearly
indicates you as a principal responsible for financial exactions performed at
all levels, especially at your department level, and makes you accountable for
lack of transparency. It even goes further to say: “Sir, your actions are
unprecedented …. and deserve more than just condemnation.”
Empowered by her
function to lead the war against corruption within the UNO and to monitor the
good carrying out of services, Mrs. Ahlenius writes that she is certain of your
implication in the financial chaos that drowns your administration which totally
lacks transparency: “Your actions – she pursues – lack transparency and violate audit
regulations”. She sums up by stating: “I am sorry to say that the
Secretary General steps into a phase of delinquency, where he is utterly
collapsing, and one might say, from which he cannot be rescued.”
Facing this report,
you opted for total silence, all the while completely ignoring it. Moreover, you
summoned its recalling from the official UNO website within the 48 hours that
followed its electronic diffusion [The Voltaire Network has found this
document for you. It is attached herewith at the bottom of the page].
We knew of this
report from a number of journalists who took note of it, yet did not initiate an
accompanying media campaign, nor did they interrogate you concerning the subject
probably by fear of triggering a process which could open the case of the
generalized corruption that prevails within your administration, at the expense
of peoples of the world.
Remember Mr.
Secretary General that Mrs. Ahlenius, following her trip back from her native
country and after the publishing of mentioned report in August 2010 which
crowned her 5-year-mandate, wrote and co-published a book with the Swedish
journalist Nialas Ekdal.
In this book titled
Mr. Hasard, the UNO deterioration under the direction of Ban Ki-moon [1], the authors describe in details
a multitude of your exactions which deprive the UNO from the minimal vital
credibility.
They qualify you as
incompetent and corrupted, thus discrediting you of your entire professional
path.
Mr. Secretary
General,
The book, just like
the report, had its share of silent attacks which contributed to its complete
suffocation at the media level. You surely know about the occult forces that
lead the combat against the truth defended by Mrs. Ahlenius? Those are the exact
same forces that protect you, Mr. Secretary General.
How dare you speak of
reforms, you, the thief?
You are probably not
used to hearing such direct, vivid and true critiques, but you should get the
habit of it. On the morality level, you surely are in no position to give reform
lessons to anyone. It would be interesting however to benefit from your
eloquence about reforms to demand their application at the UNO first. The first
step towards accomplishing this matter would be your interrogation by a special
investigation commission that would send you for trial to the competent
tribunal. The world needs a Nuremberg to judge crimes of corruption and pillage
of public assets belonging to the peoples of the world. What do you think?
Public assets which
you illegally disposed of, according to Mrs. Ahlenius, belong to the peoples of
the world, which governments finance your organization and pay your salaries,
yours and all the UNO staff.
Incidentally however,
it would be interesting to note that governments that pretend to form a
protesting bloc against the takeover of the US on the UNO mechanisms, and who
accuse you of acting for Washington’s account, avoid requesting the formation of
an investigation commission to examine accusations perpetrated against your
person by Mrs. Ahlenius! Roles are reversed and you are now giving them lessons
in reforms!
Mr. Secretary
General,
Just a few hours
before your arrival to Beirut, you made a promise to appoint a new Attorney
General for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon to replace Judge Daniel Bellemare
who resigned.
Tell us about the
nature of judges who will be appointed by a person as controversial as yourself?
Can we expect justice from judges who would accept to be appointed by a person
caught in the act by their own Under Secretary General?
Is this the “highest
degree of professionalism and transparency” so-promised by late President
Antonio Cassese?
Mr. Secretary
General,
In the name of which
Wisdom did you keep silent, facing the accusations of Mrs. Ahlenius? Is it
because you consider as a “crime of honor” or a “political crime”
the misappropriation of other people’s funds?
Or is it by fear of
seeing this case opened in front of the whole world? This is it!
Calling for a United Nations’ Spring
Let us imagine things
the other way around, and that a certain number of countries require the
formation of an investigation commission backed by proofs and evidence of your
implication as well as that of other United Nations officials.
Wouldn’t we be at the
threshold of an era that would justify a so-called “United Nations’
Spring”?
Terje
Rød-Larsen was compelled to resign from his ministerial functions in Norway
because he falsified his declarations in such a way that he did not pay taxes
for the past 10 years. With his fraudulent qualities, he was nominated to serve
at the United Nations.
Terje Rød-Larsen, the fraudster
Sir,
It seems that your loyalty for people who protect you was apparent by the
presence, at your side in Beirut, of your coordinator in Lebanon Mr. Terje
Rød-Larsen.
The latter refuses to admit
that Israel, which he considers as his second home-land, has accumulated more
than 10 000 deliberate violations of applicable resolutions issued by your UNO,
in defiance of the whole world.
Mr. Rød-Larsen merely speaks
of ‘incursions’’ and not of ‘’aggressive acts of war’’. The difference
between the two concepts is huge, since, according to Nuremburg judgment
sentence, the war of aggression represents ‘’the supreme international
crime’’ and consequently, exposes its perpetrators to prosecutions for war
crimes in front of the international justice.
You probably do not know the
difference between ‘’incursion’’ and ’’aggressive acts of war’’, just
like the Lebanese government and the permanent delegation of Lebanon at the
UNO?
Your coordinator in Lebanon,
Mr. Rød-Larsen, surely does not ignore this fact. He dissimulates the fact to
avoid any reference to the supreme international crime, which could result in
the prosecution of Israeli officials for crimes of war, notwithstanding the
recidivism factor that aggravates criminal responsibility, especially that the
number of such ‘’aggressive acts of war’’ has beaten all wars and
conflicts records.
I shall say no more, Mr. Secretary General, apologizing for not finishing
my letter by presenting my sincere regards, awaiting the results of a true
investigation as regards the contents of the report and the book written by Mrs.
Inga-Britt Ahlenius, for whom I kindly present my sincere regards and my
profound respect.
Source As-Safir (Lebanon)
Attached documents
(PDF - 597.9 kb)
|
[1] Mr Chance : – FN:s
förfall under Ban Ki-moon, by Niklas Ekdal and Inga-Britt
Ahlenius, Stockholm 2011. ISBN 978-91-7337-271-8.
No comments:
Post a Comment