Jagem, Wuodgi jok mariek, thurgi Odera
Akanyo!!!
A yes kodi, you have spoken well.
You have evoked good memory of what those who lived in the villages of
the great forest of Luo Land did as a lifestyle, and where the father of the
great, Wuod Alego Wuoyi Siro
cometh; a leader who feareth the Law - who sayeth the Law is Good and
is fair to all and made sure he practice what he preaches for the good of
all. (The word of God
sayeth, Happy is the man that feareth always: but he that hardeneth his heart
shall fall into mischief)…… A leader who promises and
stays the course through thick and thin and delivereth for the good of all, a
man worthy for credit in the goodness of his faithfulness...........A man who believes that, God created us all
equal and all must Play by the same set of rules.........who believes
that Government is for the people and Peoples Government must provide
opportunity to all in a fair and balanced manner so all can engage to play their
fair share in National Building and contributing in their small way to
collectively feed in economic development that greases the wheel of commerce and provides
for inputs of economic development. This is the pool where
distribution is quantified and and value is redistributed to economic progressiveness
to provide enough for all to get involved in their own daily activities moving
forward to helps improve lives and welfare and ultimately at the end of the day,
everyone is left satisfied and are happy sharing in love and thanking God for
the Blessings and goodness of life in harmony...............
Jagem, you see, 50years down the line of
development progress from your village homestead brought you this far to
USA……….so you advanced from a Herdsboy to a Technical Engineer in the
USA……..Like Obama Sr. who advanced to USA and became an Economists but never had
the opportunity to exercise the skills, and I can just imagine, where Kenya
would be today ……….and the progress is called Development…………
With the progress, you move forward to
improve with it your culture and tradition……so you do not leave and forget the
identity of who you are………Which it is also hard to forget traditional foods, how
valuable people of old kept it so close to their hearts and maintained its
values, because they were healthy foods that kept them alive and
strong.
Wuod
Kayuocha, while bel is called Millet, Kal too is called millet and this is why
kal is qualified to FINGER MILLET,
because it is a little smaller than bel (sorghum) and Bel is known as Sorghum
and thereby leaving out the Millet for its qualification and people prefer just
calling it Sorghum. Kal has a lot of nutrient values and easy to
digest, it is usually kept during draught and it is because when planted, it
gets ready in the farm very quickly before the maize is ready and it can be fed
with ease to the little new borns, the sick and the old. You can
also mix it with milk.
Bel
stays in the stomach for long and in the same way you don’t get hungry
quickly. It also have many medicinal values in it besides making
busaa with it………….
This
is why, I am totally against the GMO which is altering our values and is
destroying existence to our traditional food.
Last
night, by mistake, I ate those GMO toxic foods and I almost died.
I was bloated with very severe heart-burn and I took antacids but it
never paid attention to give me my peace. It went on for more than
two hours trying all possible remedies I know best but nothing yielding,
finally, I had to seek urgent medical attention. This is how bad
GMO is. Now tell me, in a situation of a poor-man in the village,
what shall become of them when faced with a case such as that happened to me
last night? Wont they die in big
numbers………….???
Anywhay,
the truth is, Bel is called Sorghum and Kal is called fingermillet, because
kal is tinier and lighter than bel
although they look alike ...................
Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
=========================
From: Jagem K'Onyiego
To: progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PK] Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PK] Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
Omollo rafiki yangu,
"So" me the pictures, because I know I am not confused. You
see, when I was growing up in Got Mumwe, I took care of Ongeche (monkeys)
invading our farms. That was an unassigned mission; to battle Ong'eche the whole
day from sunrise to sunset. I had a bag wooven from a plant called "Olandra"
which was ever filled with stones. To go with that was a "Sling" (Orujre).
Though I was pretty young but I was a great marksman with it. So, Ong'che had to
keep at bay never to invade our shamba. my breakfast lunch and sometimes supper
came from the farm in form of roast Maize. and at times Apuoyo or Awendo caught
through a trap. I was a good hunter too, very good with traps.
In those shambas we planted Beans, Kal, Millet and sometimes
Mbaazi (Obande). Mbaazi is like Pojo (or when cooked, Dengu), but it is not
Pojo. We also mixed a certain grain called 'Olayo. This also looks like Dengu
but it is not tastes sweet and is more nutresious that Dengu.
Then there was Kal (Soghurm). Kal is used in the same way as
Barley. It is a catalyst to help make Busaa be frothy and to have the Alcoholic
as well as the Nutritional content in the Busaa. Kal also helps in speeding
fermentation of Busaa before Molasses or Sukari Nguru is added in the mixture to
form "Amuna" or "Kangara." Kangara is then taken for distillation to produce
"Pelele Kmur." Are we together?
All those grains mentioned above were undergrowth in the farm.
They never went to a hight of 4 feet. In contrast to that the other two cereals
Oduma (Maize) and Bell (Millet) can grow to a height of between 6 - 8 feet. I
know this because I tended them for many years . Good harvest depended on how
much effort I and ny brothers put in the battle with "Tumbiris.
So when you tell me that Shogurm is Bell then I want to
disagree, because Bell cannot be used to ferment Busaa. Kal (sorghum) is used.
Au siyoo?
Jagem
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Geoffrey
Omollo <kidikibudi@outlook.com>
wrote:
Wuod
gi Chiedo moa Gem aka Agwenge K'Odhek,
It is the other way
round:
(Finger) millet =
Kal
Sorghum = Bel (aka yadh orie-nyasa)
Subject: Re: [PK] Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
On 2013-10-19, at 3:55 PM, Judy Miriga <jbatec@yahoo.com> wrote:
Courage
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
You're very passionate about these GMOs,
Genetically Modified Foods. I'm now curious to know what science is saying about
these GMOs. I would like to read up on what health effects they may cause in the
body. Can you give us some Research Links so we can read and be on the same page
with you? If these things are unhealthy for our bodies, we want to know about
it.
There was a time I brought my mom some maize seeds from
Canada; the seeds were so interesting in that each maize stalk would not grow
more than 3 feet tall but would produce upto 3-4 cobs each. I'm wondering if
they were GMO maize seeds. She more than doubled her maize production; but over
a period of 4 seasons, the seeds from her successive crops became more and more
"nyaluo" (behaved like the traditional seeds).
Major
lifetime achievement: Being Time Magazine's 'Person of the Year' in
2006
...As
indicated on my Resume.
*******************************
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:46:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [PK] Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
I thought Sorghum is Kal while Bell is Millet.
Jagem
***********************
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Maurice J. Oduor <mauricejoduor@gmail.com>
wrote:
Judy,
Let me read these links first to see if there's something to be concerned
about.
Courage
On 2013-10-19, at 3:55 PM, Judy Miriga <jbatec@yahoo.com> wrote:
Maurice,
Presently the only thing I have gotten some wind is Maize and Sorghum
(Bell) and I fear
for our peoples health.
Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
*********************************
From: Maurice Oduor <mauricejoduor@gmail.com>
To: Progressive Kenyans <progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "mabadilikotanzania@googlegroups.com" <mabadilikotanzania@googlegroups.com>; "youngprofessional_ke@googlegroups.com" <youngprofessional_ke@googlegroups.com>; Change Mombasa <changemombasa2012@yahoogroups.com>; "jaluo@jaluo.com" <jaluo@jaluo.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PK] Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
To: Progressive Kenyans <progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "mabadilikotanzania@googlegroups.com" <mabadilikotanzania@googlegroups.com>; "youngprofessional_ke@googlegroups.com" <youngprofessional_ke@googlegroups.com>; Change Mombasa <changemombasa2012@yahoogroups.com>; "jaluo@jaluo.com" <jaluo@jaluo.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PK] Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
Thanks Judy. I'll read these articles and render an opinion. I encourage
others to read them too.
Are you aware of
any particular food in Kenya that we're currently eating in large quantities
that is Genetically-Modified? Courage
***********************
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Judy Miriga <jbatec@yahoo.com> wrote:
Maurice,
I must thank you for your cooperation to
allow for discussion on this very sensitive matter that is about to destroy the
world because African Politicians are not willing to discuss and address it more
specifically now that GMO is leaning towards being damped in Africa after
European Nations have rejected it. World Poverty is man made and engineered from
organized and stagemanaged coup by global politically correct network conspiracy
of unscrupulous special interest.
1)
First immediate emergency from oral observation in Human production unit is that
you cannot fire from the effect of the GMO that causes weakness in body
tissues.
2) There is too much bloatness (kuodho pusu
pusu) and the stomach gets too much toxic gas which is the cause of many deaths
here in the USA and which is not common with Africa local and traditional foods
and people pass gas carelessly which is an environmental pollution that spoil
are and can easily make people sick and can endanger
life
3) Transfer of gene causes confusion of being
that God initially created because it is a biological transfer between animal
gene, human gene and plants 4) Brain and thinking faculty and human behavior
gets affected and is altered adversely
5) We then end up destroying nature and
cultural way of life if a company must feed the world and people are rendered
helpless from producing food except all live by the begging bowl.
This system of control is dangerous in that, the owners of food will give
you as and when they feel like it and with the situation of Africa where there
are too many poor people, survival will be next to impossible. I
believe this is another way of family planning. Those with food
will chose who to give food and those who cannot afford will surely
die...........Since their land will have been hijacked and taken away from them
and majority people will remain homeless and extremely poor.
6)
There are better ways to make the world stable with sustainable food sufficiency
and not by private sector company control.
Check
the footnotes for links and attachments.
Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
********************************************
From: Maurice Oduor <mauricejoduor@gmail.com>
To: mabadilikotanzania <mabadilikotanzania@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com"
<progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com>;
"youngprofessional_ke@googlegroups.com"
<youngprofessional_ke@googlegroups.com>;
Change Mombasa <changemombasa2012@yahoogroups.com>;
"jaluo@jaluo.com"
<jaluo@jaluo.com> To: mabadilikotanzania <mabadilikotanzania@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Mabadiliko] Ooops: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
Judy,
Give us some scientific links
that talk about the health effects of GMOs.
Courage
**********************************
People of the World,
Re: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
Re: Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
The world is facing an extreme deadly poisonous
Poverty situation in the near future……and it is not only possible, but
engineered. Global extreme poverty is engineered starting from the
Western Countries and is now headed to Africa. Health news in Germany shows massive
resistance to genetically engineered (GE) foods both amongst politicians and the
general public who got united against it which caused chemical giant BASF
to close its Germans biotech division. Chemical companies are into
big business without caring for the future of human life. European opponents of
GE foods are jubilant to eradicate GMO organic of gene cross breed transfer.
This explains why BASF Drug Company is moving its
genetically modified (GM) plant science headquarters from Germany to Raleigh in
North Carolina for example.
I am a very worried person, a very worried
person in deed about livelihood and survival of Human existence on earth in the
next coming few years. If I connect the dots and begin to think
hard what I have gone through in recent experience where I was faced with serious circumstance of negativity to save an awkward
situation six years ago, when I led a big demonstration to White House to
protest on a deadly election stolen in Kenya 2007/8; I now can attest that, I see very clear the
picture of that negative forces that pushed against all positive efforts I engaged to save Kenya against the mission forces that wanted Kenya to burn. I
look back and critically dicected possible actors of the reason why, and I concluded that, there was a theorized conspiracy going on that politicians did not want it known to public or openly discussed for fear it could backfire adversly and no one wanted it
to be heard loudly but undercurrent forces were in big deals and without Gods intervention, that short-changed and finally caused it to fail, it would be a different story in Kenya today.
The very people who ganged against me from
pushing the election gone bad in 2007/8, fought very hard and they were led by none other than Prof. Anyang Nyongo teamed with Joe Nyangah and Raila’s advisor Salim Lone
who made a good number of trips to USA beginning February of 2008. They met with Russ
Feingold with whom they discussed and negotiated and the mission has now turned that GMO has still remain the unfinished business that demanded
peoples humongous chunk of land for their Agri-business in Africa.
It was not going to come easy, but people were to be forcefully evicted from their homes and a conspiracy had to be hatched. That people must be vacated from their land in ways and means to pave way for large Drug Companies to illegally and unconstitutionally occupy public land. Although President Bush was able to act immediately who sent State Secretary Condoleezza Rice to go and negotiate for a truce to bring peace in Kenya, Russ Feingold quietly continued to meet privately with Prof. Nyongos group who knew what exactly was cooking in Kenya, and wanted to keep it that way; which is why, Russ Feingold totally and adamantly refused to meet with me even after I sent several requests through Senator Ben Cardin who was initially on chair for Foreign Affairs at the time before it was quickly handed over to Russ Feingold to handle Kenyan situation. I had a rough time but God was faithful and even though it was an upheld struggle, I ended up triumph against all odds that prevailed. I must also accept that, the good result come from my persistence engagement and pestering that brought and delivered good news to Kenya and where, Kofi Annan headrf an eminent team, loaded logistics that succeeded in bringing calm and establishment of peace with the formation of Coalition Government Reform Change that brought with it the New Constitutional order for Kenya.
It was not going to come easy, but people were to be forcefully evicted from their homes and a conspiracy had to be hatched. That people must be vacated from their land in ways and means to pave way for large Drug Companies to illegally and unconstitutionally occupy public land. Although President Bush was able to act immediately who sent State Secretary Condoleezza Rice to go and negotiate for a truce to bring peace in Kenya, Russ Feingold quietly continued to meet privately with Prof. Nyongos group who knew what exactly was cooking in Kenya, and wanted to keep it that way; which is why, Russ Feingold totally and adamantly refused to meet with me even after I sent several requests through Senator Ben Cardin who was initially on chair for Foreign Affairs at the time before it was quickly handed over to Russ Feingold to handle Kenyan situation. I had a rough time but God was faithful and even though it was an upheld struggle, I ended up triumph against all odds that prevailed. I must also accept that, the good result come from my persistence engagement and pestering that brought and delivered good news to Kenya and where, Kofi Annan headrf an eminent team, loaded logistics that succeeded in bringing calm and establishment of peace with the formation of Coalition Government Reform Change that brought with it the New Constitutional order for Kenya.
It is clear now that Russ Feingold was truely
after special interest take-over of Kenya and the deal was sealed that, bringing
me to the picture was going to spoil for their plan. Shortly
afterwards, Museveni who was the instigator, who initiated the ambush to wipe
out the Luos from existence in the Luo Nyanza of the Great Lakes of East Africa,
was rewarded with the illegal occupation of Migingo in a colourful ceremony
where Museveni was adorned with Luo traditional costumes distinction of a King
and was given a Luo cultural honorary stool for an elder as a gift.
What fashioned my thinking in this
sequence to realize that Railas behavior iss like that of a chameleon changing
color many times in a spar of moment is that, immediately after Kibaki announced
from State House that he was the President, Instead of Raila going to negotiate
with his 5 Pentagon members to find solution, he saw an opportunity to sneak and
dash with his son to meet with Kibaki privately at Kibakis house to do monetory
dealings leaving out Pentagon Members behind in the cold not knowing what to do
in the circumstances. It is not the first time Raila
sneaked to such negotiations for purposes of
stay-relevant-in-power deals. He takes the money to build his power
capacity and let other people hijack the opportunity of leadership. This is why
he was so confident Kibaki will handover power to him. It was again seen
when Jesse Jackson came forward to meet with Uhuru to seal Raila relevancy
of stay-in-power
to maintain and sustain the unfinished business of GMO with thieving of public
land. This means he knew all along something about what was cooking in
the business of creating a situation for sell-out to remain in the deal of
sharing political power at whatever cost with the Status Quo while
people are left fighting for him that he won, and others are killing and
destroying one another. Railas secret for power is too costly for Kenya and the
Luos in general. It is a costly political reality of confused political
greediness with unscrupulous Special Interest Companies of the world that are in
the wake of the Scramble to Africa land; to re-colonize Africa and make its
people slaves in the New unconstitutional and illegal expansionist would be
Land owners.
I am able to unravel the puzzle and clearly
spell out and state that, there is spanner at work to destroy Africa and the
world from seing sanity and applying reasonable justice that are fair to all. It
is the greed of selfish few who conspire to illegal ambush acquisition of big
chunks of Peoples’ land, wealth and resources that are being taken illegally and
unconstitutionally from the Peoples Government Trust hold in the unacceptable
occupation with pretense to feeding the world through
GMO.
People of the world, wake up! This is a war
against livelihood and survival and it is influenced by a few corporate special
business interest who are against goodwill of Peoples Government fair to all
but, take advantage of the same to lean on political patronage to influence
special interest through a Government takeover and destroy both Africa and the
world through pushing it to the third world
war..............
Congo
Government is about to make the worse mistake to negotiate with M23 and people
of Congo must stand up to protect their livelihood and survival.
Kenya too must wake up and think outside the box to save Kenya from
Museveni with his collaborative network of unscrupulous Special Business
interest. Peoples lives and security comes first on top of all
else.
Connect the dots people, where there is smoke,
there is fire........acts of patronage is against the law, it poke holes of
disunity in the Government, and it conflict with public interest fighting inside
the Government. This is he same reason for Peoples Government shut-down and why
every time there is a Government shutdown, Raila must find a reason to come to
USA to sneer, and I am not sure this is the advice from his advisors. On the
same vein, Prof. Anyang Nyongo is taking two months leave on his way to Havard
University for GMO without consulting with the people. Where is the Democratic
Rule of Law??? Why did both Raila and Prof. Nyongos plan coincide with US
peoples government shut down??? Was there theories had something they were to
benefit from it???
When Peoples Government shuts down, it is the
majority disadvantaged who suffer. In this thread, most private sectors got
support from the Government to excel. If they got a booster from the
Government, so individuals with capacity to start-up business and create jobs
but have no means to access establishment facilities are in many ways gets a
booster from the Government to succeed. It is wrong and narrow minded for
theorists of "Government does not create jobs" to
engage and benefit from Government insentives but block People from accessing
the same opportunities. I believe these are anarchists who seeks to overturn the Government by violence and by all unconstituted means where they want to confuse the society and peoples government, with no
proper regulatory
established system of order but create confusion for their selfish gains. This type of
politics have seen unscrupulous special interest punch loopholes to
acquire, manipulate and control power in the use of Government finances, and
benefit from the accumulative public wealth, public facilities and utilities to
monopolize and concentrate to channel and grant favors to themselves in their
circle of friends of the few unscrupulous special business interest with a
pretense that, Government does not create jobs......whereas, it is the same
place Private Sector gained power to build self. Ofcourse, Private Sector did
not come from space, but built their foundation through political Government
lobby and support which in reality is the creation of jobs where they were able
to expand and grow from employing more people.
Narrowing the capacity of a Government to be
overtaken by a single group of business interest is naive and it is not peoples
public interest. This Private Sector theory cannot replace the Government or
balance the wheel of commercial organized strategic system that operate economic
excellence and success.
Life
must be of meaning and caring and sharing for mutually common good of all must
take a center stage for peace, safety, security and protection of Livelihood and
survival where all remain happy and satisfied with all the goods of the earth
has in store for us.
Where
is the truth and justification, and where is the world headed
to..............??? Can we all begin to start doing something small positively
in our own special ways persistently and unite towards saving this grave
situation.................??? If it is singing, get down to sign in market places and in public
places, if it is teaching or preaching do it and reach out like you care to save
life from perishing and God will Bless us all.
Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com
------------------------------------------
Congo rebels expect 'major breakthroughs' in peace talks
Saturday October 19 2013
2 hrs ago......
Kinshasa (AFP) - Rebels in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) said on
Saturday they are heading toward "major breakthroughs" with the Kinshasa
government in peace talks in Uganda, possibly within hours.
Under Uganda's mediation, "major breakthroughs are about to be obtained in
Kampala since the heavy involvement of the international community in the
dialogue" between the two sides, the M23 movement said in a statement.
It referred to the "remarkable presence" of US special envoy to the Great
Lakes Russ Feingold and the UN special envoy Mary Robinson as well as Martin
Kobler, the head of the UN mission to the DRC, and representatives of the
European Union and African Union.
During talks on Friday, "the M23 made major concessions on its political
demands in order to make possible the signing of the peace agreement in Kampala
in the coming hours," the group said.
"By this act, our movement wishes to demonstrate its determination to
contribute to the rapid establishment of a lasting peace in the Democratic
Republic of Congo," it said.
No DRC government negotiator was immediately available for comment on the
statement.
The M23 controls an area of around 700 square kilometres (270 square miles)
in the east of the DRC, bordering Rwanda and Uganda.
The M23 was founded by former Tutsi rebels who were incorporated into the
Congolese army under a 2009 peace deal.
Complaining the deal was never fully implemented, they mutinied in April
2012, turning their guns on their former comrades and launching the latest
rebellion to ravage DR Congo's mineral-rich and conflict-prone east.
The United Nations regularly accuses Rwanda and Uganda of supporting the
M23, something both countries deny.
The negotiations in Kampala had reportedly stumbled over the question of an
amnesty for the rebels and their reintegration in the army. Backed by the
international community, the government in Kinshasa has said there will be no
impunity for the main rebel leaders.
COMMENTS:
Dr. Jimmy
The CIA isn't doing its job in the Congo but I bet
the pressure is on. Wall Street has untapped resources there.
Special Representative for Global Food Security Jonathan Shrier (Acting) participates in Hunger, Nutrition and Climate Justice Conference in Dublin
Media Note
Office of the
Spokesperson
Washington, DC
April 16, 2013
On April 15 and16, Special Representative for Global Food Security Jonathan
Shrier (Acting) participated in the “Hunger, Nutrition and Climate
Justice” Conference, held at Dublin Castle and hosted by the
Government of Ireland and the Mary Robinson Foundation.
The event brought together key policy makers and global leaders, civil
society representatives, and people who face food insecurity and undernutrition
to facilitate a dialogue with the goal of informing potential approaches to
address the nexus of hunger, nutrition and climate change in the post-2015
Development Agenda.
President of Ireland H.E. Mr. Michael D. Higgins formally opened the
conference, and speakers included former President of Ireland
Mary Robinson and former Vice-President of the United States Al Gore.
Special Representative Shrier (Acting) participated on the panel “From Learning
to Leading – Informing the post-2015 Development Agenda,” where panelists
offered different points of view on how the exchanges from the conference could
be connected to the post-2015 agenda.
The U.S government works with partners to build the resilience of
communities vulnerable to climate change, by helping partner countries develop
strategies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, transition to low-carbon
futures and better cope with climate impacts. Feed the Future, the U.S. Government hunger and
food security initiative, supports partner countries in developing their
agriculture sector to spur economic growth that increases incomes and reduces
hunger, poverty and undernutrition. These investments contribute to the health,
stability, and resilience of developing countries, and support responsible
management of natural resources in the face of a growing population and changing
climate.
To learn more, please visit here.
PRN: 2013/0419
Monsanto should be tried for 'ecocide, genocide', says NGO
Wed, Oct 16 2013 21:39 IST | 0
Views | Add your
comment
SHARE:
Monsanto should be tried for "ecocide and genocide" as its genetically
modified cotton seeds are responsible for the poor cotton crop yields,
deterioration in soil quality and suicides by farmers in India, said NGO
Navdanya slamming the World Food Prize conferred on the US multinational
Wednesday. Monsanto has attracted criticism from activists worldwide for being
conferred the top food award. Navdanya, an Indian-based non-governmental
organization which promotes biodiversity conservation, biodiversity, organic
farming and the rights of farmers, said: "Contrary to what Monsanto proclaims,
GMOs (genetically modified organisms) have led to a decline in yields and an
increase in pesticide use, soil deterioration and farmer indebtedness and
suicides. In India, most of the 284,000 farmers' suicides are in the cotton belt
- Monsanto controls 95 percent of the cotton seeds." "In a just world, Monsanto
should be tried for ecocide and genocide," it said in a statement. "Yet on Oct
16, with the full support of powers most responsible for the state of hunger in
the world, Monsanto is giving itself the World Food Prize! "We condemn this self
congratulatory accolade - the GMO emperor has no clothes... We will not allow
our Seed and Food Democracies to be hijacked by the current outmoded,
reductionistic mechanistic paradigm," it said.
It said the award comes on Oct 16, World Food Day, "a day when people all
over the world are reminded of the shameful fact that over one billion people in
the world are hungry and another billion are malnourished - this despite the
fact that government institutions and multinational seed and food conglomerates
have repeatedly over the decades declared to have the solution - one based on
industrial agriculture, chemicals, GMOs and monocultures". "FAO tells us that
more than 70 percent of food comes from small farms and small farmers. Only 10
percent of the GMO corn and soya grown by Monsanto is eaten directly. (And this
is because that 10 percent is not labelled and would be 0 percent if people had
labelling and food freedom). The other 90 percent goes to feed cars and
animals," it said. "Let us honour all the Real Food Heroes who bring us real
food by defending our food freedom- small farmers and gardeners, mothers and
chefs, honest and real scientists. Let us celebrate those who save and exchange
seed, preserve biodiversity and enrich our soils, and who through their actions
are building food security all over the world and in communities everywhere with
vibrant alternatives based on seed reform and food freedom.
******************************
Activists Destroy Genetically-Modified Papaya Trees in Hawaii: Awesome or Too Far?
Public outrage over genetically-modified foods is growing by the day.
But is it OK to cross the line into vandalism? Recent actions by anti-GMO
activists in Hawaii force us to decide.
A family farm in Puna, Hawaii, suffered from a recent act of eco-activism
where over 100 genetically-modified papaya
trees were cut down by machete during the night.
“It’s hard to imagine anybody putting that much effort into doing something
like that. It means somebody has to have passionate reason,” said Delan Perry,
vice president of the Hawaii Papaya Industry Association.
Genetically-modified (GM) papaya trees were introduced to the region to
protect against ringspot virus. In 1992, the virus became widespread, infecting
thousand of papaya trees by killing the plants leaves. As a result, the virus
cost farmers millions of dollars in losses. The genetically-modified papayas,
which are planted on the majority of farms in Puna, Hawaii, are resistant to the
dangerous ringspot virus. And it’s estimated that the genetically-modified seed
has saved Hawaii’s papaya industry over $11 million.
Puna is the center of Hawaii’s commercial papaya industry, and this
incident of eco-activism wasn’t the first of its kind. In 2011, the same farm
was attacked, with 3,000 genetically-modified papaya trees cut down over 10
acres. And only a year before 8,500 GM
papaya trees were destroyed.
Should Genetically Modified Foods Be Destroyed?
There is a clear divide between consumers who support organic farming and
those who support GMOs. Genetically-modified crops often tote reduced pesticide
use, but reports show GMOs often require extra chemicals to combat
weeds. Even more so, the untested effects of GMOs raise
enormous concerns, and consumers are still fighting for the right to know
through GMO
labeling.
At first, those of us who oppose genetically-modified foods might cheer at
this valiant act of civil disobedience. Yet, it quickly becomes apparent that
each act of vandalism negatively impacts farmers who are already struggling to
hold on to their land. The most recent attack on the genetically-modified papaya
farm in Puna cost the family over $3,000 in lost crops.
“These farmers are working really, really hard to support their families,”
says regional property owner Peter Houle. “They’ve done nothing wrong and they
feel violated.”
If papaya farmers are only protecting planting genetically-modified seeds
against the ringspot virus by , should they be punished in this way?
Images: Hawaii News
Now
Imagine - no extreme poverty. It's possible by 2030, says report.
Two recent reports say that extreme poverty could be effectively eliminated
by 2030 (AP)
More than a billion people around the world still exist in extreme poverty,
which is defined by living on less than $1.25 a day. The good news is that
number dropped by half from 1990 through 2010. And a new report says
eliminating extreme poverty altogether is “within reach” by
2030.
The report was produced by the Brookings Institution, which says that a
combination of increased shared consumption and improving global distribution of
resources have dramatically reduced the poverty rate over the past 23 years but
that “both factors are needed simultaneously,” to bring the total percentage of
those living below the $1.25 rate to 3 percent or less.
The report gained prominence on Friday when Bill Gates tweeted about it in
a message to his 13 million plus followers:
What are the prospects of ending extreme poverty? This interactive chart shows how far we've come since 1990: http://t.co/yeOPEtPv2s— Bill Gates (@BillGates) October 18, 2013
“Over the past twenty years global poverty reduction was made possible by a
consistently large mass of people lining up behind the poverty line each year,
and sufficient consumption growth to carry many of these individuals across the
threshold,” the report explains.
According to the report, there are more people living around the $1.25 mark
“than at any other consumption level in the world.” Amongst the world’s billion
people living in extreme poverty, a report released this month by the World Bank
Group says that 400 million of them
are children .
However, the World Bank Group report also had good news that aligns with
the findings of Brookings, stating that 750 million less people live in extreme
poverty today compared to 1981.
“We need to act urgently, and with a sharpened focus, to implement
effective policies in places where poverty remains entrenched, particularly
rural areas,” Jaime Saavedra, the World Bank Acting Vice President of Poverty
Reduction and Economic Management, said in a statement. The Governors of the
World Bank Group have also endorsed the goal of ending extreme poverty by
2030.
Perhaps not surprisingly, China and India have been at the forefront of
extreme poverty reduction over the past two decades. The Brookings report says
that China has now reduced the number of its citizens living in extreme poverty
into the single digits and that going forward “the baton has been passed to
India.”
From there, Brookings says sub-Saharan African faces the largest extreme
poverty gap.
So, what stands in the way of fully eliminating this most extreme form of
poverty?
Brookings says there are two major factors as they look ahead to 2030.
First, that as countries like China make progress on poverty, they will become
satisfied with the progress already made and will lack incentives to complete
the job. And secondly, that in the most greatly affected regions of the world,
populations of extreme poverty will begin to condense, making it all the more
challenging to see economic improvements.
- Poverty & Welfare
- Society & Culture
- extreme poverty
Conservative groups target U.S. Republicans who voted to end shutdown
By Gabriel Debenedetti 10
hours ago
By Gabriel Debenedetti
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Groups aligned with the Tea Party movement are
targeting two Republican U.S. senators who backed a bipartisan budget plan on
Thursday, vowing to support their challengers in Republican primaries before
congressional elections in 2014.
The plan to reopen the federal government and increase the nation's
borrowing authority ended a 16-day government shutdown that conservatives backed
in an unsuccessful attempt to weaken Democratic President Barack Obama's
healthcare overhaul.
Hours after Congress passed the measure, the Club for Growth and the Senate
Conservatives Fund endorsed Chris McDaniel, the Tea Party Republican from
Mississippi who is running for the seat occupied by Senator Thad
Cochran.
"Chris McDaniel is a constitutional conservative who will fight to stop
Obamacare, balance the budget, and get America working again, the Senate
Conservatives Fund statement said.
Cochran was among 27 Senate Republicans to support the plan to end the
shutdown. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican who
helped to craft the deal, faced a similar backlash on Friday.
McConnell's primary opponent, Tea Party candidate Matt Bevin, was endorsed
by the Senate Conservatives Fund, a group founded by former South Carolina
Senator Jim DeMint, a leading voice of the Tea Party.
The movement swept a wave of right wing lawmakers to Capitol Hill in 2010
and helped Republicans regain the House of Representatives. Groups like Club for
Growth donated heavily to a slate of successful candidates during that election
cycle.
Club for Growth - whose influence over dozens of the most conservative
members of Congress is such that its pronouncements have effectively killed some
budget proposals - already had targeted Republican Representative Mike Simpson,
the only one of Idaho's four members of Congress to vote for the bill that ended
the shutdown.
Club for Growth is backing Tea Party Republican Bryan Smith as a more
conservative alternative to Simpson. Smith also has been endorsed by
FreedomWorks, a conservative group whose chief executive, Matt Kibbe, predicted
on Friday that Tea Party conservatives' frustration with moderate Republicans
could lead a split of the Republican Party.
Taken together, the endorsements signal that the battle over Obamacare -
and far-right conservatives' push to put more of their candidates in Congress
with an eye toward killing the Affordable Care Act - is far from
over.
Club for Growth and the Senate Conservatives Fund are major contributors to
the campaigns of several staunch conservatives. The Center for Responsive
Politics says they are the two largest donors to Senator Ted Cruz, the Texas
Republican whose 21-hour floor speech in September helped set the stage for the
shutdown fight over the health reform law.
Cochran, 75, has been in office since 1978 and has not officially announced
that he is running for re-election in 2014.
In endorsing McDaniel, Club for Growth's political action committee (PAC)
said in a statement, "If Cochran runs for re-election, he will likely have the
entire Republican establishment behind him - all the more reason that Senator
McDaniel will need the strong support of the Club's PAC."
McCONNELL's CHALLENGERS
McConnell, who has been in office since 1984 and has clashed with Cruz,
will face a two-pronged challenge next year.
Well-funded Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, Kentucky's secretary of
state, is running for McConnell's seat. But before he can face her, McConnell
has to defeat Bevin in the Republican primary.
In backing Bevin, the Senate Conservatives Fund cited various votes by
McConnell to fund the government, which the group equated to funding Obama's
health care law.
McConnell's campaign mocked the SCF's endorsement of Bevin.
"Matt Bevin now has the dubious honor of standing with a self-serving D.C.
fundraising group that made its name by recruiting and promoting unelectable
candidates that ensured Barack Obama a majority in the Senate," McConnell
spokeswoman Allison Moore said in a statement.
"They clearly care less about Kentuckians than they do about their
reputation for supporting laughably bad candidates," Moore added.
DeMint, the Senate Conservative Fund's founder, emphasized the ongoing
efforts to pressure moderate Republicans on Friday with an editorial in the Wall
Street Journal headlined, "We Won't Back Down on Obamacare."
In an interview on Thursday, Club for Growth president Chris Chocola, a
former Indiana congressman, pledged to endorse more candidates, noting that the
shutdown and surrounding debates "may have defined our opportunities a little
bit better."
Heritage Action spokesman Dan Holler also said his group would keep
fighting the health reform law, in part by helping the opponents of Democrats in
conservative states, such as Senators Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Kay Hagan of
North Carolina.
(Editing by David Lindsey and Doina Chiacu)
-------------------
US prosecutor condemns
Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
From: khaguli maurice
To: "progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com"; "uchunguzionline@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:56 AM
Subject: [PK] KM and OKLI, kama hii beer!
To: "progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:56 AM
Subject: [PK] KM and OKLI, kama hii beer!
Ruto; Uhuru hii maneno ya ICC ni kama hii beer ndani ya maninio yangu.
Uhuru; ai! Ruto, hata hii yangu ni nzito sana sijui kama tutafaulu but wewe uko
na nafasi ya kusetiwa free msee-Mudavadi ndie alilaani sisi-niombee ndugu!
----- Forwarded
Message -----
From: paul nyandoto
To: "wanakenya@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
From: paul nyandoto
To: "wanakenya@googlegroups.com"
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
The man is right (US
prosecutor):
Remember even the ICC, Ocampo; Koffi Anna etc told kenyans to form local
tribunal to try PEV victims at home. But hell no, they wanted Hague and ICC.
Then they used ICC propaganda to climb to presidency & Deputy president.
Whose mistake is it?. It is not ICC `s mistake that Uhuru & Ruto are there.
The mistake is on Kenyans who wanted it. So all these hindsight wisdom springing
while ICC was used as a propaganda to attain power are all rubbish. Let them go
to Hague, that is where their destiny rest. Cheating people all the time will
finally fail and its is failing. I wish they knew.
Paul.
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:16:32 -0400 Subject: US prosecutor condemns Hague
trials of Kenyan leaders From: kjmwangi@gmail.com To:
progressive-kenyans@googlegroups.com CC: Wanakenya@googlegroups.com;
uchunguzionline@yahoogroups.com; africa-oped@yahoogroups.com;
VuguVuguMashinani@yahoogroups.com
Ndugu Khaguli and other loudmouths:
Can you let us know what is
going here? Do you agree with this prosecutor?
----- Forwarded
Message -----From: Maurice Oduor
To: Progressive Kenyans
Cc: WanaKenya; uchunguzi online
; Africa-Oped
; VVM Vuguvugu Mashinani
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PK] US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
To: Progressive Kenyans
Cc: WanaKenya
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PK] US prosecutor condemns Hague trials of Kenyan leaders
KM,
This David Crane does
not offer any solution. In this article, do you see any solution he has offered?
Just saying that "political realities have to be taken into account" is an empty
statement.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Kuria-Mwangi
<kjmwangi@gmail.com> wrote:
Ndugu Khaguli and other
loudmouths:
Can you let us know what is
going here? Do you agree with this
prosecutor?
******
Daniel Howden in Nairobi
theguardian.com, Friday 18 October
2013 02.52 EDT
David Crane, the
former chief prosecutor of the special court for Sierra Leone. Photograph: Ben
Curtis/AFP/Getty Images
A former chief prosecutor of the
international criminal court has condemned its
cases against Kenya's president and vice-president, warning that the
indictments could damage the fledgling international justice system.
David Crane, the US lawyer who
built the case against Liberia's former president
Charles Taylor, said his successors at The Hague had ignored political
realities in pursuing the Kenyan prosecution, which he said "could be the
beginning of a long slide into irrelevance for international law".
Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president,
is due to stand trial next month at the ICC, the first time a sitting head of
state will have done so. Along with his deputy, William Ruto, whose separate but
related trial has already begun, Kenyatta is accused of masterminding the
violence that killed at least 1,300 people in the wake of a disputed election at
the turn of 2007-08.
Last week the African Union passed a resolution
calling for immunity for all serving African heads of state.
"I would never have indicted or
gotten involved in justice for the Kenyan tragedy," said Crane, a former chief
prosecutor of the special court for Sierra Leone, a precursor to the ICC. "It's
placed them in a situation where they are damned if they do or damned if they
don't."
The African Union has called on
the Kenyan leaders not to attend hearings at The Hague until the UN security
council, which oversees the ICC, has responded to its recent demands.
France is working on a UN
resolution that would defer the Kenyan cases for 12 months, according to a
senior diplomat in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi.
Human rights groups have said
giving in to AU demands for immunity would set a terrible precedent that would
encourage heads of state to trample constitutional term limits, cling to power
and rig elections. "It's become a lose-lose situation," said Crane.
Crane said the cases he built
during three years of investigations in westAfrica from 2002-05 had taken into account local politics as
well as the law. "Politics is the bright red thread of modern international law,
a successful prosecution must factor in the international stage."
After ad hoc tribunals dealt with
the fallout from civil wars in the Balkans and west Africa, as well as the
genocide in Rwanda, the ICC got a permanent home in the Netherlands and issued
its first arrest warrants in 2005.
Under the Argentinian lawyer Luis
Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor's office pursued high-profile African leaders,
including Sudan's Omar al-Bashir – who has ignored the warrant – and a number of
alleged warlords in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Crane said Moreno-Ocampo had a
"political tin ear" and had been overly ambitious in his indictments.
When Kenya came close to a civil
war and as many as 400,000 people lost their homes after a contested election
result in 2007, mediators brokered a deal under which a national tribunal was
meant to be set up to try the guilty. The ICC stepped in as a court of last
resort when the Kenyan parliament could not agree on a local alternative.
Moreno-Ocampo became a celebrity
in Kenya, with minibus taxis named after him, but his initial popularity waned,
and this was exacerbated by his decision to name Kenyatta and Ruto, political
rivals whose supporters had fought during the violence, among the indictees. The
pair united in a "coalition of the accused" and won elections this year in a
campaign that portrayed the ICC as a colonial throwback.
Moreno-Ocampo was replaced last
year as chief prosecutor by Gambia's Fatou Bensouda.
Crane said the ICC should have
used the threat of its intervention to nudge for reform rather than launching
prosecutions that the Kenyan elite would never support.
"It's a question of some justice
versus no justice," he said. "If it's perceived that Kenyatta and Ruto have won
then we're thrown back to the pre-Taylor era in Africa."
----------------------------------------------------
Top Ban Ki-moon aide fights Sierra Leone corruption claimsBy KEMO CHAM in Freetown | Friday, March 1 2013 at 12:12
UN Secretary General`s Special Representative on
Sexual Violence in Conflict, Zainab Hawa Bangura.
The UN Secretary General`s
Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Ms Zainab Hawa Bangura,
is fighting to clear her name in an embarrassing graft scandal at
home.
The former Sierra Leonean
health minister has been linked to a corruption scandal involving a Bill and
Belinda Gates Foundation-funded immunisation project run by the Geneva-based
Global Alliance for Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI).
In December, GAVI announced
it had uncovered the misuse of funds allocated to the Health and Sanitation
ministry of about $1.1 million.
As a result, an existing
grant worth over $500,000 was frozen and a pending two year grant of $5. 4
million suspended.
President Ernest Bai Koroma in January suspended 10 senior health ministry
officials as the Anti Corruption Commission (ACC) started a probe.
But government critics have
alleged Ms Bangura was an accomplice as some of the loss happened when she was
health minister, and want her investigated.
Ms Bangura has denied any involvement.
A close ally of the
president, she served as foreign affairs minister between 2007 and
2010.
She was moved to the health ministry in January 2011 ahead of her current
appointment in August the following year.
The alleged misuse of donor
funds, according to the GAVI Alliance, occurred between 2008 and 2010, with one
part in 2011.
Ms Bangura is believed to be
nursing ambitions of a more advanced political career, with a possible eye on
the presidency, a position she first contested for in 2002.
Seen as a defence
But in what is seen as a defence for the embattled former minister, GAVI said the purchase
of materials related to the embezzlement was done by a constituted
committee, in line with the National Public Procurement
Act.
It added: “As a Minister, Ms Bangura did not participate in that
Procurement Committee.”
All of the suspended
officials were said to be part of that committee, but the critics say they are
only scapegoats.
A group calling itself Concerned Sierra Leoneans has been extremely vocal
on the issue.
It has alleged that Mrs
Bangura took time off from her UN job to come home and destroy evidence prior to
the institution of investigation.
This issue has affected her
image, hence, according to the GAVI Alliance, she had requested them to clarify
her role on the matter.
Concerned Sierra Leoneans however, is pressurising GAVI to act and has even
accused the Alliance itself of “gross negligence” and possible complicity in the
theft.
"We intend to hold GAVI
responsible for the theft because of their sloppy oversight and will not
hesitate to sue them…,” the group said in a statement, claiming to be speaking
on behalf of defenceless Sierra Leonean children.
According to reports,
officials from the GAVI Alliance were scheduled to be in Freetown this week
seeking an explanation from the government about the missing
funds.
AU: A union for African
people or presidents?
speak
outRead Story: AU: A union for
African people or presidents?
speaker’s corner
Most Popular
- Kenyan farmer reaps from quail eggs venture
- Tanzania on EAC: You won't get rid of us easily
- Tanzania ‘formally’ isolated from EAC
- The girl who met Gaddafi 'in hell'
- 'My daughter was a virgin', says Mugabe's wife
- Wanted Ugandan socialite seized in Rwanda
- Madagascar's new sex tourism
- Westgate strike 'proof of Al-Shabaab might'
- Botswana now backs President Kenyatta on ICC
- Pay scandal rocks Sierra Leone`s troops in Somalia
*******************************************
ACCORDING to the Kenyan DAILY
NATION today, the UN SG Ban Ki-Moon has asked African leaders to adhere to their
commitments to the ICC. Meanwhile South Korean ICC JudgeSang-Hyun Song said the
Kenyan Parliament twice refused to enact a local tribunal.
Let Ban Ki-Moon adhere to his
commitment to transparency and integrity by stepping down for a probe into the
allegations against him.
Mohamed Warsama
On Friday, October 18, 2013 4:09 PM, mohamed warsama
wrote:
Corruption
at the Top
An Open Letter to the dishonorable Ban Ki-moon
United Nations
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon visited Lebanon to prepare for a possible NATO
action against Syria. Too busy conspiring against the peace he should be
defending, he forgot to inquire about Israel’s daily violations of Lebanese
sovereignty. In an open letter published by the Lebanese press, Arab thinker
Hassan Hamade lambastes Mr. Ban and his representative Mr. Rød-Larsen, recalling
that far from standing up for principles, both are thugs wallowing in
corruption.
Mr. Secretary General,
While listening to
your speech in Beirut, in which you proclaimed the absolute necessity to proceed
with the reforms, “because the
flame of freedom ignited in Tunisia shall never be extinguished”, I
immediately thought of a Swedish person, famous for her integrity, transparency
and credibility in terms of reforms. I meant Mrs. Inga-Britt Ahlenius, who was
once the UN Under Secretary General, in charge of the United Nations Office of
Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), which main mission was to ensure the good
services providing of this “big machine”, namely in the finance field and
who served under your supervision.
You certainly know,
Mr. Secretary General, that Mrs. Ahlenius, whose professional career has always
been flawless, be it in Sweden or during her office at the administration of the
UNO, has drafted a 50-page report related to the status of the Organization in
terms of finance and utilization of public funds in budgets of various
services.
Said report clearly
indicates you as a principal responsible for financial exactions performed at
all levels, especially at your department level, and makes you accountable for
lack of transparency. It even goes further to say: “Sir, your actions are
unprecedented …. and deserve more than just condemnation.”
Empowered by her
function to lead the war against corruption within the UNO and to monitor the
good carrying out of services, Mrs. Ahlenius writes that she is certain of your
implication in the financial chaos that drowns your administration which totally
lacks transparency: “Your actions – she pursues – lack transparency and violate audit
regulations”. She sums up by stating: “I am sorry to say that the
Secretary General steps into a phase of delinquency, where he is utterly
collapsing, and one might say, from which he cannot be rescued.”
Facing this report,
you opted for total silence, all the while completely ignoring it. Moreover, you
summoned its recalling from the official UNO website within the 48 hours that
followed its electronic diffusion [The Voltaire Network has found this
document for you. It is attached herewith at the bottom of the page].
We knew of this
report from a number of journalists who took note of it, yet did not initiate an
accompanying media campaign, nor did they interrogate you concerning the subject
probably by fear of triggering a process which could open the case of the
generalized corruption that prevails within your administration, at the expense
of peoples of the world.
Remember Mr.
Secretary General that Mrs. Ahlenius, following her trip back from her native
country and after the publishing of mentioned report in August 2010 which
crowned her 5-year-mandate, wrote and co-published a book with the Swedish
journalist Nialas Ekdal.
In this book titled
Mr. Hasard, the UNO deterioration under the direction of Ban Ki-moon [1], the authors describe in details
a multitude of your exactions which deprive the UNO from the minimal vital
credibility.
They qualify you as
incompetent and corrupted, thus discrediting you of your entire professional
path.
Mr. Secretary
General,
The book, just like
the report, had its share of silent attacks which contributed to its complete
suffocation at the media level. You surely know about the occult forces that
lead the combat against the truth defended by Mrs. Ahlenius? Those are the exact
same forces that protect you, Mr. Secretary General.
How dare you speak of
reforms, you, the thief?
You are probably not
used to hearing such direct, vivid and true critiques, but you should get the
habit of it. On the morality level, you surely are in no position to give reform
lessons to anyone. It would be interesting however to benefit from your
eloquence about reforms to demand their application at the UNO first. The first
step towards accomplishing this matter would be your interrogation by a special
investigation commission that would send you for trial to the competent
tribunal. The world needs a Nuremberg to judge crimes of corruption and pillage
of public assets belonging to the peoples of the world. What do you think?
Public assets which
you illegally disposed of, according to Mrs. Ahlenius, belong to the peoples of
the world, which governments finance your organization and pay your salaries,
yours and all the UNO staff.
Incidentally however,
it would be interesting to note that governments that pretend to form a
protesting bloc against the takeover of the US on the UNO mechanisms, and who
accuse you of acting for Washington’s account, avoid requesting the formation of
an investigation commission to examine accusations perpetrated against your
person by Mrs. Ahlenius! Roles are reversed and you are now giving them lessons
in reforms!
Mr. Secretary
General,
Just a few hours
before your arrival to Beirut, you made a promise to appoint a new Attorney
General for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon to replace Judge Daniel Bellemare
who resigned.
Tell us about the
nature of judges who will be appointed by a person as controversial as yourself?
Can we expect justice from judges who would accept to be appointed by a person
caught in the act by their own Under Secretary General?
Is this the “highest
degree of professionalism and transparency” so-promised by late President
Antonio Cassese?
Mr. Secretary
General,
In the name of which
Wisdom did you keep silent, facing the accusations of Mrs. Ahlenius? Is it
because you consider as a “crime of honor” or a “political crime”
the misappropriation of other people’s funds?
Or is it by fear of
seeing this case opened in front of the whole world? This is it!
Calling for a United Nations’ Spring
Let us imagine things
the other way around, and that a certain number of countries require the
formation of an investigation commission backed by proofs and evidence of your
implication as well as that of other United Nations officials.
Wouldn’t we be at the
threshold of an era that would justify a so-called “United Nations’
Spring”?
Terje
Rød-Larsen was compelled to resign from his ministerial functions in Norway
because he falsified his declarations in such a way that he did not pay taxes
for the past 10 years. With his fraudulent qualities, he was nominated to serve
at the United Nations.
Terje Rød-Larsen, the fraudster
Sir,
It seems that your loyalty for people who protect you was apparent by the
presence, at your side in Beirut, of your coordinator in Lebanon Mr. Terje
Rød-Larsen.
The latter refuses to admit
that Israel, which he considers as his second home-land, has accumulated more
than 10 000 deliberate violations of applicable resolutions issued by your UNO,
in defiance of the whole world.
Mr. Rød-Larsen merely speaks
of ‘incursions’’ and not of ‘’aggressive acts of war’’. The difference
between the two concepts is huge, since, according to Nuremburg judgment
sentence, the war of aggression represents ‘’the supreme international
crime’’ and consequently, exposes its perpetrators to prosecutions for war
crimes in front of the international justice.
You probably do not know the
difference between ‘’incursion’’ and ’’aggressive acts of war’’, just
like the Lebanese government and the permanent delegation of Lebanon at the
UNO?
Your coordinator in Lebanon,
Mr. Rød-Larsen, surely does not ignore this fact. He dissimulates the fact to
avoid any reference to the supreme international crime, which could result in
the prosecution of Israeli officials for crimes of war, notwithstanding the
recidivism factor that aggravates criminal responsibility, especially that the
number of such ‘’aggressive acts of war’’ has beaten all wars and
conflicts records.
I shall say no more, Mr. Secretary General, apologizing for not finishing
my letter by presenting my sincere regards, awaiting the results of a true
investigation as regards the contents of the report and the book written by Mrs.
Inga-Britt Ahlenius, for whom I kindly present my sincere regards and my
profound respect.
Source As-Safir
(Lebanon)
Attached documents
(PDF -
597.9 kb)
|
[1] Mr Chance : – FN:s förfall under Ban Ki-moon, by
Niklas Ekdal and Inga-Britt Ahlenius, Stockholm 2011. ISBN
978-91-7337-271-8.
No comments:
Post a Comment