Africa, Politics
The Plight of the Africans in Their Big Men’s Pistol.
by . • May 30, 2015 • 0 Comments
By Stephen Par Kuol,
South
Sudan ANTI-government forces posting with a huge missile they captured
from the government forces in Panyinjiar County, Unity State(Photo: Via
Abraham Majak)
May 30, 2015(Nyamilepedia)
—- With its compact cartographic shape and susceptibility to violent
armed conflicts, Africa, the second largest continent on the globe has
been metaphorically described by some western pundits as a loaded pistol
whose trigger is located somewhere in the Gulf of Guinea (Western Congo
and Southern Cameroon),with its ammunition magazine somewhere in the
extreme Horn of Africa (Somalia) and the barrel on the southern tip of
the continent (Cape Province, SAR).
This
literately means that the African people live inside a loaded automatic
handgun ready to fire at any time. Some African gurus of history and
political science have dismissed that as Euro-centric prejudice.
Arguable or not, the home truth is that humanity has never experienced
real peace in the continent since the era of slave trade, colonial
conquest, and scramble for Africa and unfortunately up to the
independence in 1960s.
Things
have only gone from bad to worse with liberation and independence.
While most of what we have to deal with today is the aftermath of
colonialism, bashing the long gone colonialists for everything is really
shirking leadership responsibility. Like Asians who have so far
overcome the bruises of colonialism, we are masters of our own destiny
to make this continent a hell or paradise for our people. We have all it
takes to make life fun and liveable in this cradle of humanity. What is
missing is the statesmanship in African politics. The African leaders
in their club of dictators called African Union (AU) talk very big but
do very little in their countries as their own people continue to wallow
in misery.
Today, from
Eritrea to Zimbabwe and from South Sudan to Uganda and Burundi, the
African people have been trapped in what Professor Patrick Lumumba of
Nairobi University Law School has called “Martyrs syndrome”. Martyrs Syndrome
is a political psychosis of the liberation armies/movements turned
–ruling parties in post war African countries. The most common symptom
of this psychosis is the paternalistic conviction on the part of the
so-called liberators that they deserve everything in the country they
martyred liberating.
This
pathological mentality prescribes that the liberated (the populace) are
the ruled and the liberators are rulers with unquestionable authority
over them. My own sojourn in Post War South Sudan politics has exposed
me to the spectacle of this thing called liberated –liberators
discourse. In this discourse, the liberators see everything in their
liberated country as dividend of their sacrifice and success. This
includes public resources and the political power they earned through
bullets (not ballots). Even the term corruption has by implication
gained virtuous currency in the society where the so-called political
leaders are entitled to loot the country straight faced.
One South Sudanese political scientist at Juba University has called those illegally amassed resources “SPLA I fought Wealth” That is called “graft” in the civilized world of sane and sober, but in the world of those goons, it is called “payback”
for the time and opportunities lost during the liberation struggle.
Even the demand for the freedom we all fought for is now branded as
errant nuisance of the west. Meritocracy and institutionalism have been
deliberately eschewed to advance this thing we have called lootocracy in
our Juba English of drinking joints. Subsequently, South Sudan has
been long condemned to the reign of political ineptitude, mediocrity,
ethnic bigotry and corruption of the ruling overlords. All this is
called “payback”, of course, without term limit!
In
Robert Magube’s tradition, revolutionaries can be retired only by the
Mother Nature. In solemn term, African liberation leaders do not retire
without political violence. No wonder, civil wars are raging in most of
the African countries ruled by those hooligans who call themselves
revolutionaries. I call those “wars of liberation from villainous
liberators”. In most of the African countries with former guerrilla
leaders at the helm, those “war made politicians “(in the word of Prof.
Peter Adwok Nyaba ) have created a sterile world of oppressors. They
usurp the rule of law and place themselves above the law and the whole
justice system, to the point where a few conscientious judges and
lawyers have absconded.
The
rest have been knuckled down to live with the hollow that even the
President can also be the lawmaker when it comes to his throne. The
supreme law of the land (the constitution) is amended at the behest of
His Excellency the President to extend his own rule of gun. This has
been witnessed in Burundi, South Sudan, Uganda, Zimbabwe and so many
other African countries. Yowery Musveni of Uganda, the guerrilla
commander turned life President has been running his country with iron
fist amending the constitution three times since 1985. He shunned
multiparty democracy through physical elimination and intimidation.
Robert
Mugabe, the infamous liberation leader who led his country to
independence in 1980 ordered killing of thousands of people who refused
to vote for him during the last elections he shamelessly rigged through
intimidation and bribery. He has been the only president Zimbabweans
have known since then. President Isiyias Afiworki of Eritrea has
executed many of his former comrades in arms and introduced a red terror
that has cowed everybody to political servitude in the country. The Red
Sea despot has been leading an anti-intellectual movement that has
exiled the national intelligentsia and the best cadres of the liberation
struggle. He has been the only presidents Eritreans have known since
independence in 1991. In truth, what happened in the SPLM of South
Sudan, EPLF of Eritrea, ZANUPF of Zimbabwe and NRM of Uganda is a case
of chicken devouring its own eggs.
In
Burundi, President Pierre Nkurunziza, the former guerrilla leader has
been violently wrestling with the people to extend his despotic rule in
blatant violation of Arusha Peace Agreement enshrined in the
constitution with clearly defined term limit. Despite wise counsels of
so many world leaders to yield to the demand of his people, President
NKuruniziza insists that there is no Burundi without him in power. He is
thus adamant to glide the country back to another civil war to ensure
that he is made life president like Mugabe and Musevene. One wonders
what President Nkurunziza wants to do with more years in office after
squandering ten years without accomplishing a thing for Burundi! This is
typical of the so-called African liberation leaders. The typical
African dictator will use every tool at his disposal to cling to morally
decayed power.
In South Sudan, the cowboy clown called Salva Kiir
Mayardit has turned his newly independent country into a bestial human
butchery to extend his reign of terror, genocide, widespread insecurity
and economic depression. Kiir’s oppressive regime has reduced to nothing
the meaning of “the rule of law.” It has created a state of affairs in
which “terror” has become its definition of liberation. Anyone who does
not toe its line is treated as enemy of the state. More than that,
he/she may be actually executed by the President’s personal hoodlums.
Salva Kiir has built a violent kleptocracy fighting for its own
survival at the expense of the nascent nation.
It is a cult of mediocrity without any program for nation building, if any, it is quite the opposite: “subversion”.
One ugly scar Kiir’s regime has inflicted on the psyche of South Sudan
is the polarization of the nation into sectarian cocoons of mutual
hatred. In terms of the quality of life, the economy, morality, culture,
justice system, health facilities, quality of education, have pitifully
degenerated. Suffering, pain, poverty and oppression have
become the core characters of South Sudan independence. Even the freedom
of assembly or speech provided for in the national constitution is
thwarted by Kiir’s Police State. So the question is: where is the
freedom we toiled and martyred for as a people? It is unbelievable but
it is self-evident that “the self-rule “generations of South Sudanese
people have been clamoring for is now synonymous with “self-ruin” under
Salva Kiir. In a word, life is miserable!
I
have dwelled more on my native country of South Sudan but what is
happening there is not necessarily peculiar to South Sudan. It is a
common African neo-colonial experience. Although few did well at
governance, majority of the liberation leaders throughout the continent
have been political disgrace. The leap to borrow as models could be from
that of Melese Zinawe and Paul Kagama in term of institutional reform
and the economic development, but the two are also guilty of
dictatorship and prima donna. Only Mandela was the polar opposite.
Most
of the rest have reduced the very noble meaning of the term liberation
to what Christopher Clapham of Cambridge University has called “Curse of the Liberation”.
In my book, political liberation means much more than taking the means
of power from a foreign colonial power or from an ingenious dictator.
With specific reference to South Sudan, the meaning of political
liberation goes beyond hoisting that blue star flag, composing a
national anthem; building mansions, palaces houses and having our own
currency. This is, but a very limited meaning of liberation. Liberation
must be intellectual .It must be found in the minds and the hearts of
the liberated. In another word, it must be holistic for it to mean what
we wanted it to mean in the first place. Ultimately, it must include
getting rid of neo-colonial greed, which illegally exports national
assets off shore.
Historically,
there was a time during our liberation struggle when we thought all we
wanted was to rule ourselves. The pioneers of African independence
movements like Khwame Nkhuruma , Mzee Jomo Kenyata, Emperor Haile
Selesia, Mawlimu Nyareer gave it all they had. Paradoxically, the very
heroes of the African independence who replaced colonial powers emulated
their colonial oppressors and made themselves demigods in their newly
independent countries.
Preoccupied
with self-aggrandizing projects, they miserably failed to deliver on
democracy and economic development. That is why so many decades into our
political independence, Africa is sinking deeper and deeper into not
only material poverty but also spiritually and morally in the midst of
political sovereignty. Instead of practicing the founding values of
their liberation movements (freedom), the African freedom fighters
became anti-freedom. For the worst part, the big men of African
liberation movements have introduced vicious political tribalism
(politicized ethnicity) which has not only consumed the sense of
nationhood but also tends to promote miss rule and dictatorship.
In
African political culture, national political leaders take refuge in
their tribal constituencies whenever the center can’t hold for them and
that has terribly undermined progress toward democratic transformation
in so many African countries. We keep voting back to power the same few
greedy, self-centered, corruption-oriented individuals because if we do
not, the ruling party will murder us. Even when we do not vote for
them, they steal the vote with our permission, knowing that there are no
reprisals against them. This is humanly much harsher than residing
inside a loaded pistol. Hence, it must not be left to posterity. This
continent must be liberated from the greed of its dictators, poverty,
disease and ignorance. This must commence with ousting inept tyrants
like Kiir, Museveni, Mugabe, Nkurunziza and all their likes. Only then
can we realize the true meaning of liberation and turn this loaded
pistol into the Garden of Eden God meant it to be from the Genesis.
Stephen Par Kuol is a researcher and freelance writer on African political and humanitarian affairs. He can be reached by e-mail at kuolpar@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment